Osborn v. Commissioner of Social Security

Full title: BENJAMIN N. OSBORN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 1, 2015

2:14-cv-2424-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2015)

Opinion

BENJAMIN N. OSBORN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 2:14-cv-2424-KJN United States District Court, E.D. California. September 1, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         The court's records show that plaintiff has not yet indicated whether or not he consents to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days of this order, plaintiff shall file a brief statement indicating whether or not he consents to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge for all purposes, including the entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Importantly, plaintiff is under no obligation to so consent, but plaintiff's designation in that regard assists the court in determining how the case will be administratively processed.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.