From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. Carrion

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 11, 2013
105 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-11

In re Aurea ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. Gladys CARRION, etc., et al., Respondents.

Susan Pepitone, Forest Hills, for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Simon Heller of counsel), for Gladys Carrion, respondent.


Susan Pepitone, Forest Hills, for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Simon Heller of counsel), for Gladys Carrion, respondent.

Determination of respondent Office of Children and Family Services, which, after a fair hearing, affirmed the determination of respondent Administration for Children's Services denying petitioner's application for exceptional foster care benefits pursuant to 18 NYCRR 427.6 retroactive from June 29, 2008 to April 8, 2010, or for special foster care benefits pursuant to 18 NYCRR 427.6 retroactive from June 29, 2008 to April 23, 2009, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.], entered March 22, 2012, dismissed, without costs.

The determination to deny petitioner's application is supported by substantial evidence ( see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 180–181, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183 [1978] ). The record shows that petitioner failed to meet the requisite standards for the enhanced benefits for the relevant time periods ( see 18 NYCRR 427.6). Petitioner's arguments, that the two fair hearings were conducted in a manner that denied her due process rights and in violation of the procedural requirements of 18 NYCRR 358–5.6(b), were not raised at the administrative level or in Supreme Court, and thus, they are unpreserved for review by this Court ( see Matter of Khan v. New York State Dept. of Health, 96 N.Y.2d 879, 880, 730 N.Y.S.2d 783, 756 N.E.2d 71 [2001];Green v. New York City Police Dept., 34 A.D.3d 262, 825 N.Y.S.2d 9 [1st Dept. 2006] ).

GONZALEZ, P.J., FRIEDMAN, ABDUS–SALAAM, ROMÁN, CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. Carrion

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 11, 2013
105 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Ortiz v. Carrion

Case Details

Full title:In re Aurea ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. Gladys CARRION, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2456
961 N.Y.S.2d 917

Citing Cases

Berman v. N.Y. State Dep't of Soc. Servs.

On the merits, the determination to discontinue petitioner's public assistance benefits is supported by…