From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orr v. Peterson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 12, 2015
No. 3:14-cv-00898-AC (D. Or. May. 12, 2015)

Opinion

No. 3:14-cv-00898-AC

05-12-2015

CORWIN DELANO ORR, Plaintiff, v. DERRICK PETERSON and S. NEELY, Defendants.


ORDER HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [27] on April 9, 2015, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [20]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation [27], and therefore, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [20] is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 12 day of May, 2015.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Orr v. Peterson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 12, 2015
No. 3:14-cv-00898-AC (D. Or. May. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Orr v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:CORWIN DELANO ORR, Plaintiff, v. DERRICK PETERSON and S. NEELY, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 12, 2015

Citations

No. 3:14-cv-00898-AC (D. Or. May. 12, 2015)

Citing Cases

Vanvalkenburg v. Or. Dep't of Corr.

The parties do not cite and this Court has not located any case that has explicitly addressed whether §…

Vanvalkenburg v. Or. Dep't of Corr.

The parties do not cite and this Court has not located any case that has explicitly addressed whether §…