From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orozco-Carrazco v. Longley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 12, 2012
CV No. 11-41 ERIE (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2012)

Opinion

CV No. 11-41 ERIE

01-12-2012

JESUS OROZCO-CARRAZCO, Petitioner, v. ARCHIE B. LONGLEY, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on February 15, 2011, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

Presently before the Court are Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Petitioner's Motion for Writ of Mandamus. In her Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) dated October 12, 2011, Magistrate Judge Baxter recommended that the Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed and the Motion for Writ of Mandamus be denied. The parties were given until October 31, 2011 to file written objections. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, we adopt Magistrate Judge Baxter's October 12, 2011 R&R as the Opinion of the Court.

AND NOW, this _ day of January, 2012 it is HEREBY ORDERED that said report and recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 4) is DISMISSED. Petitioner's Motion for Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. 11) is DENIED.

_____________

Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Orozco-Carrazco v. Longley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 12, 2012
CV No. 11-41 ERIE (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Orozco-Carrazco v. Longley

Case Details

Full title:JESUS OROZCO-CARRAZCO, Petitioner, v. ARCHIE B. LONGLEY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

CV No. 11-41 ERIE (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2012)

Citing Cases

Louis v. Carlson

As a result, petitioner is no longer subject to the outcome of the October 17, 2013 disciplinary hearing.…