From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ORMS v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 29, 2004
No. 09-03-399 CR (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2004)

Opinion

No. 09-03-399 CR.

Opinion Delivered January 29, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Angelina County, Texas Trial Cause No. 03-0458. Appeal Dismissed.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., BURGESS and GAULTNEY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On December 13, 2003, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. Counsel for appellant notified the Court that the appellant did not desire to pursue the appeal. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App.P. 37.3(b).


Summaries of

ORMS v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 29, 2004
No. 09-03-399 CR (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2004)
Case details for

ORMS v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:TONY RAY ORMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jan 29, 2004

Citations

No. 09-03-399 CR (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2004)