From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orlowsky v. East House Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 16, 1961
32 Misc. 2d 664 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)

Opinion

February 16, 1961

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, WILLIAM S. SHEA, J.

Joseph Heller for appellant.

Berg A. Boghossian for respondent.


The lease here provides that rent is payable "without any set-off or deduction whatsoever". Having thus agreed, the tenant could not assert and have the court pass upon its counterclaim in the summary proceeding ( Amazon Management Corp. v. Paff, 166 Misc. 438; Linker v. Herard, 13 Misc.2d 445).

The final order should be modified by reversing the judgment therein in favor of tenant on its counterclaim, and dismissing said counterclaim without prejudice to any other action thereon as tenant may be advised, and as modified affirmed, thereby permitting a recovery to landlord of $315, with $25 costs.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Final order modified, etc.


Summaries of

Orlowsky v. East House Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 16, 1961
32 Misc. 2d 664 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)
Case details for

Orlowsky v. East House Enterprises, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS ORLOWSKY, Appellant, v. EAST HOUSE ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 16, 1961

Citations

32 Misc. 2d 664 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)
228 N.Y.S.2d 19

Citing Cases

White Plains Galleria v. Woodlawn Partners

The respondent's obligation to pay rent existed completely independent of the success or failure of the…

W & S ASSOCS. v. Absolute Greek

In that context, the waiver provisions have been enforced and the public policy manifested by the adoption of…