From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orban v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jan 19, 1942
313 Ill. App. 144 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Summary

In Orban v. City of Chicago, 313 Ill. App. 144, a judgment for plaintiff was sustained where witnesses testified there was a difference of between 1 and 3 inches in the level of adjoining slabs of concrete in a sidewalk.

Summary of this case from Arvidson v. City of Elmhurst

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,743. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed January 19, 1942

HIGHWAYS AND STREETS, § 537pedestrian injured by fall on defective sidewalk, sufficiency of evidence. Where there was a difference in level of adjoining slabs of concrete in a walk, which defective condition had existed for six or seven years, and the plaintiff stumbled over the depression in the dark and fell and broke her arm, under the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the jury might reasonably have found that the sidewalk was defective and that the city had constructive notice of it and was negligent, while the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care at and before the time of her injury.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Cook county; Hon. ROBERT A. MEIER, JR., presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in first division, first district, this court at June term, 1941.

Barnet Hodes, Corporation Counsel, for appellant;

James A. Velde, Paul A.H. Shults and Barney Fagen, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel.

Finn Fitzpatrick and J.W. Horwitz, for appellee;

Robert S. Cook, of counsel.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed January 19, 1942.


Summaries of

Orban v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jan 19, 1942
313 Ill. App. 144 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

In Orban v. City of Chicago, 313 Ill. App. 144, a judgment for plaintiff was sustained where witnesses testified there was a difference of between 1 and 3 inches in the level of adjoining slabs of concrete in a sidewalk.

Summary of this case from Arvidson v. City of Elmhurst

In Orban v. City of Chicago, 313 Ill. App. 144, a judgment for the plaintiff was sustained where it appeared that there was a difference in level of adjoining slabs of concrete and the plaintiff stumbled and fell resulting in a broken arm.

Summary of this case from Walter v. City of Rockford
Case details for

Orban v. City of Chicago

Case Details

Full title:Ira Orban, Appellee, v. City of Chicago, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jan 19, 1942

Citations

313 Ill. App. 144 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
39 N.E.2d 84

Citing Cases

Arvidson v. City of Elmhurst

In Walter v. City of Rockford (1947) 332 Ill. App. 243 (Second Dist.), there was a crack between two…

Arvidson v. City of Elmhurst

These decisions, involving Federal Employers Liability Act cases, are governed by uniformity requirements…