Summary
holding that a principal's notes and memoranda regarding an accident at the school prepared in anticipation of litigation were work-product
Summary of this case from Heartland Express, Inc., of Iowa v. TorresOpinion
No. 1D04-4490.
April 15, 2005.
Michael R. D'Lugo, Esq. and Richard E. Ramsey, Esq. of Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioner.
John W. Dill, Esq. of Attorneys Trial Group, Orlando; Deborah Halvorsen, Esq. of O'Hara, Spradley Waters, Jacksonville, for Respondent.
Petitioner, Orange Park Assembly of God, doing business as Orange Park Christian Academy, seeks certiorari review of the trial court's order compelling disclosure of a report produced by a teacher at the school and notes and memoranda prepared by the school's principal regarding an incident during which the minor daughter of respondent, Susan Russell, was struck by a motor vehicle when petitioner was allegedly responsible for supervising her. Petitioner argues that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in ordering disclosure because the documents constitute work product. We agree.
The documents created in anticipation of litigation are privileged pursuant to the work product doctrine because it was foreseeable that litigation might ensue from the incident. See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Ballasso, 789 So.2d 519, 520 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); McRae's, Inc. v. Moreland, 765 So.2d 196, 197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Additionally, both the teacher and principal gave deposition testimony indicating that each had contemplated litigation at the time the documents were prepared. As such, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in granting the motion to compel where there was no showing that respondent needs the documents and could not obtain substantially the same information without undue hardship. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(3). Therefore, we GRANT the petition for writ of certiorari, quash the trial court's order, and REMAND the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
ERVIN, PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.