Opinion
06-01-2017
Prince OPARAJI, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Lawrence T. YABLON, et al., Defendants–Respondents.
Prince Oparaji, appellant pro se. Maurice Oparaji, appellant pro se. Rivkin Radler LLP, New York (Jonathan B. Bruno of counsel), for respondents.
Prince Oparaji, appellant pro se.
Maurice Oparaji, appellant pro se.
Rivkin Radler LLP, New York (Jonathan B. Bruno of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered July 12, 2016, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (a)(7), and denied plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment, or in the alternative, for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
In this pro se action alleging fraud, conspiracy, conversion and defamation by defendants in connection with their legal representation of plaintiff Prince Oparaji in an underlying motor vehicle accident, defendants, by their service of a motion to dismiss the action, made within the time extension granted by the court, did not default, contrary to plaintiffs' contentions (see generally CPLR 320[a] ; 2211; 3211[a]; see also Urena v. NYNEX, Inc., 223 A.D.2d 442, 637 N.Y.S.2d 49 [1st Dept.1996] ; Colbert v. International Sec. Bur., 79 A.D.2d 448, 437 N.Y.S.2d 360 [2d Dept.1981], lv. denied 53 N.Y.2d 608, 442 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 425 N.E.2d 899 [1981] ). Plaintiffs' further argument that defendants defaulted in answering their motion seeking a default judgment is refuted by the record.
We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
TOM, J.P., MAZZARELLI, MANZANET–DANIELS, WEBBER, JJ., concur.