From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Neal v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 19, 1965
341 F.2d 581 (5th Cir. 1965)

Opinion

No. 21437.

February 12, 1965. Rehearing Denied March 19, 1965.

Sidney E. Lewis, Goldman, Presser Lewis, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

James H. Walsh, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Edward F. Boardman, U.S. Atty., Middle Dist. of Florida, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DYER, District Judge.


We have carefully considered the contentions of the appellant dealing with the participation of the trial judge in the conduct of the trial, the admission into evidence of proof of the contents of the containers without accounting for their absence. Cf. Watson v. United States, 5 Cir., 224 F.2d 910, and the lack of sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury. We find no error on any of the grounds presented. As to the rule relating to the admissibility of oral testimony touching on the absence of stamps and the nature of the contents of the containers in "moonshine" prosecutions, see our recent decision in Burney v. United States, 5th Cir., 339 F.2d 91, 1964.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

O'Neal v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 19, 1965
341 F.2d 581 (5th Cir. 1965)
Case details for

O'Neal v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Robert O'NEAL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 19, 1965

Citations

341 F.2d 581 (5th Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

Holley v. United States

However, the law is conclusively settled against the contention of the appellant and the judgment must be…