From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Neal v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jan 15, 2008
Case No.: 2:06-CV-01063-FCD-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2008)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:06-CV-01063-FCD-DAD.

January 15, 2008


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, D/B/A GLAXOSMITHKLINE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONDITIONALLY FILE DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL


Defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply to Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application to Conditionally File Under Seal Documents and Exhibits in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Federal Preemption) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

O'Neal v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jan 15, 2008
Case No.: 2:06-CV-01063-FCD-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2008)
Case details for

O'Neal v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

Case Details

Full title:TERRI S. O'NEAL, individually and as successor-in-interest to the Estate…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Jan 15, 2008

Citations

Case No.: 2:06-CV-01063-FCD-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2008)