From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Omnipol, A.S. v. Worrell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
May 7, 2021
Case No. 8:19-cv-794-VMC-TGW (M.D. Fla. May. 7, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 8:19-cv-794-VMC-TGW

05-07-2021

OMNIPOL, A.S., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTOPHER WORRELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson (Doc. # 139), filed on March 23, 2021, recommending that Defendant Christopher Worrell's Motion for Determination of Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Doc. # 132) be granted to the extent that Worrell is awarded $19,334.00 for his reasonable attorneys' fees.

Plaintiffs filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation on April 21, 2021. (Doc. # 149). Worrell filed a response to the objection on May 5, 2021. (Doc. # 152).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). If a party files a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact by the magistrate judge, the district court must conduct a de novo review with respect to that factual issue. Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567, 1576 (11th Cir. 1992). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Hous. v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Wilson's Report and Recommendation as well as the Plaintiffs' objection thereto, the Court overrules the objection, adopts the Report and Recommendation, and grants Worrell's Motion to the extent described in the Report and Recommendation. The Court agrees with Judge Wilson's detailed and well-reasoned findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Report and Recommendation thoughtfully addresses the issues presented, and the objection does not provide a basis for rejecting the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson (Doc. # 139) is ADOPTED. (2) Defendant Christopher Worrell's Motion for Determination of Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Doc. # 132) is GRANTED to the extent that Worrell is awarded $19,334.00 for his reasonable attorneys' fees.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 7th day of May, 2021.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Omnipol, A.S. v. Worrell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
May 7, 2021
Case No. 8:19-cv-794-VMC-TGW (M.D. Fla. May. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Omnipol, A.S. v. Worrell

Case Details

Full title:OMNIPOL, A.S., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTOPHER WORRELL, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: May 7, 2021

Citations

Case No. 8:19-cv-794-VMC-TGW (M.D. Fla. May. 7, 2021)

Citing Cases

Webb v. City of Venice

Thus, the defendant estimates that attorney Mack-Majka has spent 72.5 hours regarding fee entitlement matters…

GS Holistic, LLC v. Brother Pastor LLC

” Id. “Furthermore, fee applicants are required to exercise ‘billing judgment.'” Omnipol, A.S. v. Worrell,…