From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olsen v. City of Schenectady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 20, 1995
214 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 20, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Schenectady County (Ferradino, J.).


On August 12, 1984, plaintiff, an 11-year-old child, sustained injuries when she struck her head on a drainage gutter while diving at a swimming pool owned and operated by defendant. The injuries consisted of a four-centimeter laceration to her forehead just above the nose, resulting in a permanent finescar line in the shape of a "Y" and intermittent headaches. Plaintiff's personal injury action was bifurcated and liability was tried before a jury which apportioned liability 40% to plaintiff and 60% to defendant. Upon the consent of both parties, the issue of damages was tried before Supreme Court without a jury, resulting in an award of $80,000. Defendant now appeals contending that the award is excessive (see, CPLR 5501 [c]).

Based upon our review of the record, we find that the award of damages does not deviate materially from reasonable compensation (see, Marx v Pross, 197 A.D.2d 800, 801; Reed v Harter Chair Corp., 185 A.D.2d 547, 549-550) and, therefore, the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

Mikoll, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Olsen v. City of Schenectady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 20, 1995
214 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Olsen v. City of Schenectady

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH OLSEN, Formerly Known as ELIZABETH TERRY, Respondent, v. CITY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 20, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 350

Citing Cases

Smith v. Cattani

See, e.g., Dehaarte v. Ramenovsky, 67 AD3d 724 (2nd Dept. 2009), mod'g and af'g 20 Misc3d 1124(A) (Sup. Ct.…

Hornicek v. Yonchik

With respect to the award for past pain and suffering, the record amply supports the conclusion that…