From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olkewicz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 16, 1994
633 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-3700.

March 16, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Indian River County, Paul B. Kanarek, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Mallorye G. Cunningham, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The appellant's post-conviction motion was received by the circuit court clerk two days after the expiration of the two year time limit set forth in rule 3.850(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and was denied as untimely. The motion was signed by the appellant, a prisoner proceeding pro se, and notarized by a prison employee three days before the deadline.

On these facts, the date of filing does not conclusively demonstrate that the motion was untimely. Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1992); Rule 33-3.005(9), Fla. Admin. Code (1993). We therefore reverse the order of denial and remand the case for further proceedings.

GLICKSTEIN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Olkewicz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 16, 1994
633 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Olkewicz v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES OLKEWICZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 16, 1994

Citations

633 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Rector v. State

Finally, a Rule 3.860 motion that is notarized on a certain date is deemed to have been filed on that date.…

Hunt v. State

The trial court erred in treating it as a rule 3.850 motion because it was not filed within thirty days after…