From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 7, 2001
788 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 2D00-1363.

Opinion filed March 7, 2001.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Jack Espinosa, Jr., Judge.

Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Oliver challenges the circuit court's order requiring him to pay $10,741.74 in restitution and $130 in investigative costs as conditions of his probation.

Oliver argues, and the State acknowledges, that the State did not meet its burden in demonstrating the amount of loss to be compensated for by restitution. § 775.089(7), Fla. Stat. (1997); Lunsford v. State, 637 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). We agree, and reverse and remand for a separate hearing on the restitution amount.

The State argues that these issues were not preserved for appeal because Oliver did not specifically argue before the trial court that the State had not met its burden. However, the record shows that Oliver made sufficient objection to the amount of restitution and the award of investigation costs both at the time he entered the plea and again when the sentence was pronounced.

Northcutt, A.C.J., and Campbell, Monterey, (Senior) Judge, Concur.


Summaries of

Oliver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 7, 2001
788 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Oliver v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHADWICK LABELLE OLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 7, 2001

Citations

788 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)