From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Bank of Am., N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Jun 17, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-12186-PBS (D. Mass. Jun. 17, 2013)

Summary

dismissing Chapter 93A claim as time-barred where plaintiff noticed cracks in the basement floor of the house he had purchased outside the limitations period, but only later complained and sued when the cracks became bigger

Summary of this case from Pagliaroni v. Mastic Home Exteriors, Inc.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-12186-PBS

06-17-2013

CHARLENE OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE:

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMSS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

(DOCKET ENTRY # 8)


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

(DOCKET ENTRY # 11)

BOWLER , U. S. M J.

Pending before this court is a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Docket Entry # 8) filed by defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("defendant") under Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule 12(b)(6)"). Also pending before this court is a motion for leave to amend the complaint (Docket Entry # 11) filed by plaintiff Charlene Oliver ("plaintiff") under Rule 15(a)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule 15(a)(2)").

A magistrate judge has "the authority to decide the motion to amend outright" under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Maurice v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 235 F.3d 7, 9 n.2 (1st Cir. 2000) (referring to motion for leave to file amended complaint to add new count).

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND


Summaries of

Oliver v. Bank of Am., N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Jun 17, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-12186-PBS (D. Mass. Jun. 17, 2013)

dismissing Chapter 93A claim as time-barred where plaintiff noticed cracks in the basement floor of the house he had purchased outside the limitations period, but only later complained and sued when the cracks became bigger

Summary of this case from Pagliaroni v. Mastic Home Exteriors, Inc.

dismissing Chapter 93A claim as time-barred where plaintiff noticed cracks in the basement floor of the house he had purchased outside the limitations period, but only later complained and sued when the cracks became bigger

Summary of this case from Pagliaroni v. Mastic Home Exteriors, Inc.
Case details for

Oliver v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLENE OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Jun 17, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-12186-PBS (D. Mass. Jun. 17, 2013)

Citing Cases

Pagliaroni v. Mastic Home Exteriors, Inc.

The discovery rule requires that the claim accrue from the date the defendant first knew or reasonably should…

Pagliaroni v. Mastic Home Exteriors, Inc.

The discovery rule requires that the claim accrue from the date the defendant first knew or reasonably should…