From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olic v. HDSP Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2018
Case No. SA CV 16-2234-MWF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. SA CV 16-2234-MWF (SP)

03-29-2018

MILORAD OLIC, Petitioner, v. HDSP Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 25) is granted and Judgment will be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice. DATED: March 29, 2018

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Olic v. HDSP Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2018
Case No. SA CV 16-2234-MWF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Olic v. HDSP Warden

Case Details

Full title:MILORAD OLIC, Petitioner, v. HDSP Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2018

Citations

Case No. SA CV 16-2234-MWF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2018)

Citing Cases

Olic v. McComber

The cases cited herein all apply Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 931 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (deprivation…