From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'GORMAN v. UTAH REALTY CONSTRUCTION CO. ET AL

Supreme Court of Utah
Jan 20, 1943
133 P.2d 318 (Utah 1943)

Opinion

No. 6456.

Decided January 20, 1943.

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; Dallas H. Young, Judge.

For former opinion, see 102 Utah 523; 129 P.2d 981.

C.E. Norton, of Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Ball Musser, E.F. Richards, and Romney, Faux Boyer, all of Salt Lake City, for respondents.


On petition for rehearing our attention is called to the fact that we reversed this cause as to all the defendants. Since our opinion 102 Utah 523, 129 P.2d 981, discloses that there were no errors in the judgment of the lower court as to the defendants Utah Realty and Construction Company and Roy Chapman, the judgment as to them should stand. Therefore, our order should be modified to read as follows: "for the reason that the findings do not support the judgment on the counterclaim, the cause is reversed with instructions to grant a new trial as between plaintiff O'Gorman and Ruth and Eli Hampton. As to the issues raised between plaintiff and Utah Realty and Construction Company and Roy Chapman, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed."

With this modification, the petition for rehearing is denied.

LARSON, McDONOUGH, and MOFFAT, JJ., concur.

WADE, J., votes to grant a rehearing.


Summaries of

O'GORMAN v. UTAH REALTY CONSTRUCTION CO. ET AL

Supreme Court of Utah
Jan 20, 1943
133 P.2d 318 (Utah 1943)
Case details for

O'GORMAN v. UTAH REALTY CONSTRUCTION CO. ET AL

Case Details

Full title:Maude O'GORMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant v. UTAH REALTY CONSTRUCTION CO., a…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Jan 20, 1943

Citations

133 P.2d 318 (Utah 1943)
133 P.2d 318

Citing Cases

O'GORMAN v. UTAH REALTY CONSTRUCTION CO. ET AL

Reversed with instructions to grant a new trial. For opinion on rehearing, see 102 Utah 534; 133 P.2d 318.…