holding there was no duty to warn of danger of traversing unfamiliar terrain in darkness, without mentioning any defects [memorandum and order pursuant to Appeals Court rule 1:28]
Summary of this case from McKinnon v. CollinsNo. 07-P-1778.
June 26, 2008.
Judgment affirmed.
holding there was no duty to warn of danger of traversing unfamiliar terrain in darkness, without mentioning any defects [memorandum and order pursuant to Appeals Court rule 1:28]
Summary of this case from McKinnon v. CollinsFull title:GLADYS OGNI v. WILLIAM SCHLIEN another
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Jun 26, 2008
The cases cited by the defendants are not to the contrary, as they did not involve evidence of structural…
Eason v. Marriott Int'l, Inc.An "open and obvious danger obviates not only the duty to warn but also 'operates to negate the existence of…