From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ogier v. KC Care, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 15, 2019
Case No. 3:18-cv-0361-YY (D. Or. Jul. 15, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:18-cv-0361-YY

07-15-2019

MELODY OGIER, Plaintiff, v. KC CARE, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued Findings and Recommendation in this case on June 17, 2019. ECF 27. Magistrate Judge You recommended that Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the scheduling order and to file an amended complaint be denied. No party has filed objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act ("Act"), the court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, "the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

If no party objects, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) ("There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate's report to which no objections are filed."); United States. v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (holding that the court must review de novo magistrate judge's findings and recommendations if objection is made, "but not otherwise").

Although review is not required in the absence of objections, the Act "does not preclude further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard." Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. Indeed, the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) recommend that "[w]hen no timely objection is filed," the court review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations for "clear error on the face of the record."

No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 27. Plaintiff's Motion for Modification of the Scheduling Order and Leave to Amend the Complaint (ECF 19) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 15th day of July, 2019.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ogier v. KC Care, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 15, 2019
Case No. 3:18-cv-0361-YY (D. Or. Jul. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Ogier v. KC Care, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MELODY OGIER, Plaintiff, v. KC CARE, LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 15, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:18-cv-0361-YY (D. Or. Jul. 15, 2019)

Citing Cases

Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLC

See Ogier v. KC Care, LLC, No. 3:18-CV-00361-YY, 2019 WL 3210089, at *3 (D. Or. June 17, 2019) ("Courts have…

Barnett v. Cal. Dep't of Motor Vehicles

(“Courts have held that waiting... two months after discovery of new facts to file a motion for leave to…