From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sinko

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 23, 2012
No. 1505 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1505 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 99 DB 2009

01-23-2012

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. MICHAEL DAVID SINKO, Respondent


Attorney Registration No. 24681

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2012, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated October 24, 2011, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

ORDERED that Michael David Sinko is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of four years retroactive to September 26, 2009, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Mr. Justice McCaffery dissents.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sinko

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 23, 2012
No. 1505 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sinko

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. MICHAEL DAVID SINKO…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

No. 1505 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Jan. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Danenberg

Other cases involving fraud have occasioned the imposition of a suspension. See Office of Disciplinary…