From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Michael

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 8, 2010
Nos. 1370 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, 48 DB 2008 (Pa. Apr. 8, 2010)

Summary

In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. James Robert Michael, No. 48 DB 2008, the Disciplinary Board found that respondent commingled and misappropriated approximately $100,000 over a four year period but respondent provided credible Braun mitigation.

Summary of this case from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Donohue

Opinion

Nos. 1370 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, 48 DB 2008.

April 8, 2010.

Attorney Registration No. 50861. Westmoreland County.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2010, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated December 18, 2009, the Petition for Review and response thereto, the request for oral argument is denied and it is hereby

ORDERED that James Robert Michael is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years retroactive to March 31, 2008, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justices SAYLOR and McCAFFERY dissent, as they would impose the five years recommended by the Disciplinary Board.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Michael

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 8, 2010
Nos. 1370 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, 48 DB 2008 (Pa. Apr. 8, 2010)

In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. James Robert Michael, No. 48 DB 2008, the Disciplinary Board found that respondent commingled and misappropriated approximately $100,000 over a four year period but respondent provided credible Braun mitigation.

Summary of this case from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Donohue
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Michael

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL Petitioner v. JAMES ROBERT MICHAEL…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 8, 2010

Citations

Nos. 1370 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, 48 DB 2008 (Pa. Apr. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schappell

ding that a mental disorder was a substantial factor in causing professional misconduct, such evidence may be…

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Donohue

66. In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. James Robert Michael, No. 48 DB 2008, the Disciplinary Board found…