From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office Depot v. Ortega

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 27, 2006
931 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1D04-5625.

June 27, 2006.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Jonathan D. Ohlman, Judge.

Timothy Dunbrack of Kelley, Kronenberg, Gilmartin, Fichtel Wander, Orlando, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Gary L. Fernandes of The Law Offices of Davis Fernandes, Gainesville; Susan W. Fox and Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox Loquasto, P.A., Tampa and Tallahassee, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.


Office Depot, the employer/carrier (E/C), appeals a final workers' compensation order directing it to pay claimant permanent total disability (PTD) benefits, together with supplemental benefits. Claimant, Anna Ortega, cross-appeals the denial of her claim for penalties, contending the judge of compensation claims (JCC) erred in finding the E/C timely filed its notice of denial within the statutory period provided in section 440.192(8), Florida Statutes. We summarily affirm the award of PTD benefits, concluding that the JCC's findings were based on competent, substantial evidence, and his interpretation of the applicable statutes governing a determination of PTD was correct. As to his denial of the claim for penalties, it clearly appears from the record that the employer did not file its notice of denial within 14 days after its receipt of the petition for benefits, as required by section 440.192(8), and the denial is reversed. See also Kilbourne Sons v. Kilbourne, 677 So.2d 855, 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ERVIN, PADOVANO, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Office Depot v. Ortega

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 27, 2006
931 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Office Depot v. Ortega

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE DEPOT and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 27, 2006

Citations

931 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Brandywine Convalescent Care v. Ragoobir

The record, therefore, does not contain CSE to support a finding of PTD based under the first of the three…