granting defendant's summary judgment motion because plaintiff had not produced medical expert testimony regarding causation
Summary of this case from Guinan v. A.I. Dupont Hosp. for ChildrenNo. 33, 2004.
August 19, 2004.
Appeal from the Superior Court, New Castle County, No. CA 00C-12-236.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
granting defendant's summary judgment motion because plaintiff had not produced medical expert testimony regarding causation
Summary of this case from Guinan v. A.I. Dupont Hosp. for Childrenaffirming grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-physician where plaintiff did not provide expert testimony regarding causation
Summary of this case from Hess v. A.I. Dupont Hospital for Childrenaffirming Superior Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant physician where plaintiff failed to provide expert causation evidence
Summary of this case from Dishmon v. Fuccistating that the "purpose of expert medical testimony, as recognized by the General Assembly, . . . is that, subject to the exceptions listed in the statute, the proximate cause of injuries that are claimed to be attributable to medical negligence are not within the common knowledge of a layperson"
Summary of this case from Nichols v. Christiana Care Health Sys.Full title:O'DONALD v. McCONNELL
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Aug 19, 2004
18 Del. C. § 6853; Russell v. Kanaga, 571 A.2d 724, 732 (Del. Super. 1990); O'Donald v. McConnell, 858 A.2d…
Vick v. Khan18 Del. C. § 6853; Russell v. Kanaga, 571 A.2d 724, 732 (Del. Super. 1990); O'Donald v. McConnell, 858 A.2d…