From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odom v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jul 23, 1975
538 P.2d 167 (Nev. 1975)

Opinion

No. 7796

July 23, 1975

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; John F. Mendoza, Judge.

Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Howard N. Ecker, Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

Robert List, Attorney General; George E. Holt, District Attorney, and Dan M. Seaton, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.


OPINION


A jury found John Benjamin Odom guilty on one count of burglary and one count of larceny. On appeal he contends that prejudicial error was committed when the trial judge refused to allow a challenge for cause to one of the jurors who was later excused peremptorily.

Although the appellant later exhausted his peremptory challenges, there remained no one on the jury whom the appellant had challenged for cause. In Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 12, 422 P.2d 230, 235-236 (1967), where the identical issue was raised, we refused to decide whether the trial court erred in denying the challenge for cause. See also State of Nevada v. Raymond, 11 Nev. 98 (1876). Cf. Bryant v. State, 72 Nev. 330, 305 P.2d 360 (1956).

Applying the rationale of Mears v. State, supra, we affirm.


Summaries of

Odom v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jul 23, 1975
538 P.2d 167 (Nev. 1975)
Case details for

Odom v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BENJAMIN ODOM, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jul 23, 1975

Citations

538 P.2d 167 (Nev. 1975)
538 P.2d 167

Citing Cases

McClure v. State

After exhausting all peremptory challenges, the jury contained no one whom appellant had challenged for…