From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odom v. St. Tammany Parish S.O

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Apr 28, 2009
CIVIL ACTION, NO. 09-0109, SECTION "D"(3) (E.D. La. Apr. 28, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION, NO. 09-0109, SECTION "D"(3).

April 28, 2009


ORDER


The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed by the plaintiff on April 17, 2009, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Rickey D. Odom's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and § 1915A.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Odom's § 1983 claims for deprivation of property taken from his cell brought against the defendants, Detective Jayme Seymour, Detective Brad Rummel, Lieutenant Scott Hinson, Corporal Dennis Francis Cauilloet, and Starla Van Stennis, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted pursuant to § 1915 and § 1915A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Odom's § 1983 claims challenging his conviction and sentence are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted pursuant to § 1915 and § 1915A until such time as the conditions set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), are met.

New Orleans, Louisiana.


Summaries of

Odom v. St. Tammany Parish S.O

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Apr 28, 2009
CIVIL ACTION, NO. 09-0109, SECTION "D"(3) (E.D. La. Apr. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Odom v. St. Tammany Parish S.O

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY D. ODOM v. ST. TAMMANY PARISH S.O., ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: Apr 28, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION, NO. 09-0109, SECTION "D"(3) (E.D. La. Apr. 28, 2009)

Citing Cases

Parker v. Gusman

Therefore, it is of no consequence whether plaintiff is alleging that he was deprived of his property through…

Mitchell v. Kayo

Therefore, it is of no consequence whether plaintiff is alleging that he was deprived of his property through…