From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odighizuwa v. Strouth

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 10, 2008
261 F. App'x 498 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-7089.

Submitted: December 19, 2007.

Decided: January 10, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Magistrate Judge. (7:06-cv-00720-mfu).

Peter O. Odighizuwa, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Peter O. Odighizuwa appeals the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Odighizuwa v. Strouth, No. 7:06-cv-00720-mfu, 2007 WL 1170640 (W.D.Va. Apr. 17, 2007 2007 WL 2007337, July 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The case was decided by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Odighizuwa v. Strouth

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 10, 2008
261 F. App'x 498 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Odighizuwa v. Strouth

Case Details

Full title:Peter O. ODIGHIZUWA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer S. STROUTH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 10, 2008

Citations

261 F. App'x 498 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Bynum v. Saunders

Plaintiff fails to present any allegations that plausibly suggest that this limited confinement in isolation…