From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Brian v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 31, 1995
649 So. 2d 336 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Summary

In O'Brian, 649 So.2d 336, the defendant was convicted of the nonexistent crime of attempted manslaughter by culpable negligence.

Summary of this case from Lewellen v. State

Opinion

No. 92-3630.

January 31, 1995.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County; Ben Gordon, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Nada M. Carey, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, for appellee.


We must reverse O'Brian's conviction for attempted manslaughter and remand for a new trial because a jury instruction was given on attempted manslaughter by culpable negligence, a non-existent crime in Florida. Taylor v. State, 444 So.2d 931 (Fla. 1983); Arline v. State, 550 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). We also remand for resentencing on O'Brian's conviction for aggravated battery (a second-degree felony), as the State concedes that the sentence was improperly enhanced to a first-degree felony under section 775.087(1), Florida Statutes (1991), based upon O'Brian's use of a weapon in committing the offense.

BOOTH, MICKLE and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Brian v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 31, 1995
649 So. 2d 336 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

In O'Brian, 649 So.2d 336, the defendant was convicted of the nonexistent crime of attempted manslaughter by culpable negligence.

Summary of this case from Lewellen v. State
Case details for

O'Brian v. State

Case Details

Full title:LORI JEAN O'BRIAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 31, 1995

Citations

649 So. 2d 336 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Lewellen v. State

Lewellen raises two other challenges to his petit theft conviction which have no merit but which warrant…