From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Bierne v. Seeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

June, 1925.


Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The defendant has more necessary and material witnesses residing in the county where the accident occurred than the plaintiff has in the county where the action is commenced. Under the circumstances, the place of the transaction or occurrence should control the place of trial. ( Cole v. Ocean Accident Guarantee Corp., 179 App. Div. 442.) Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Bierne v. Seeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

O'Bierne v. Seeley

Case Details

Full title:FRANK O'BIERNE, Respondent, v. CLARK J. SEELEY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1925

Citations

214 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)