From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oberlein v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1976
51 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

February 23, 1976


In an action inter alia to permanently enjoin the defendants from restricting or obstructing the use of a certain avenue in the Town of Hempstead as a public street, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 20, 1974, which granted the motion of the defendant City of New York (1) to vacate its default in answering, (2) to set aside a judgment of the same court, dated April 25, 1974, granted after an inquest, and (3) for leave to interpose an answer. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The time within which the city may serve its answer is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Special Term is vested with broad discretionary power in the opening of a default judgment. Its discretion will be upheld on appeal in the absence of gross abuse (see 9 Carmody-Wait 2d, N Y Prac., § 63:186). The record before us does not warrant a finding of an abuse of discretion. Cohalan, Acting P.J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Oberlein v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1976
51 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Oberlein v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE G. OBERLEIN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Smithtown General Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

It goes without saying that the law favors resolution of disputes on the merits ( see, CPLR 5015 [a]; Glass…

Commonwealth Metal v. Paragon Auto Radiator

Moreover, nothing occurred during the course of this proceeding to vitiate the personal jurisdiction over…