Opinion
January 17, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.).
Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the motion is granted.
We conclude that a joint trial of the two negligence actions involved herein would be appropriate in view of the plaintiff's claim, which was supported by a medical affidavit, that the second accident aggravated the injuries sustained in the first accident (see, Boyman v Bryant, 133 A.D.2d 802; Megyesi v Automotive Rentals, 115 A.D.2d 596; Thayer v Collett, 41 A.D.2d 581; Potter v Clark, 19 A.D.2d 585). The interests of justice and judicial economy would best be served by a joint trial of these actions. Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Kunzeman and Eiber, JJ., concur.