From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Obando v. Fortune Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 18, 1990
563 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

In Obando v. Fortune Insurance Co., 563 So.2d 116, 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), the appellate court affirmed an order denying attorney's fees.

Summary of this case from Tristar Lodging, Inc. v. Arch Speciality Ins. Co.

Opinion

No. 90-41.

May 22, 1990. Rehearing Denied July 18, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Ronald M. Friedman, J.

Marc L. Goldman and Carlos Lidsky, Hialeah, for appellant.

Lockett Blair and Jerri A. Blair, Tavares, and Matt Hellman, Plantation, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.


We affirm the trial court order denying relief in a declaratory suit seeking attorney's fees based on an alleged wrongful withholding of benefits under an automobile insurance policy.

At the time the complaint was filed, there were no unpaid medical bills pending and the carrier had asked for follow-up information and any additional medical bills. When subsequent medical bills accrued and the aggregate exceeded the insured's $2,000 deductible, the carrier settled all claims submitted within thirty days.

Consequently, until such time as benefits were wrongfully withheld, the insured's attorney was in no better position than the insured himself to claim a denial of coverage and the right to any applicable attorney's fees. See Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Battaglia, 503 So.2d 358 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co. v. DeWitt, 458 So.2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Obando v. Fortune Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 18, 1990
563 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

In Obando v. Fortune Insurance Co., 563 So.2d 116, 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), the appellate court affirmed an order denying attorney's fees.

Summary of this case from Tristar Lodging, Inc. v. Arch Speciality Ins. Co.

In Obando, 563 So.2d at 117, there were no unpaid medical bills pending, and the insurer had merely requested "follow-up information and any additional medical bills."

Summary of this case from State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Gil
Case details for

Obando v. Fortune Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN OBANDO, APPELLANT, v. FORTUNE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 18, 1990

Citations

563 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Tristar Lodging, Inc. v. Arch Speciality Ins. Co.

See Garcia v. Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company, 246 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1971) (where there is no…

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Gil

State Farm first contends that Stone was not entitled to any attorney's fees because the jury awarded payment…