From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oatman v. Oatman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1943
267 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

December 30, 1943.

Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party, and complaint dismissed, without costs. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed. Memorandum: The separation agreement, pleaded as a defense, bars the maintenance of this action. ( Winter v. Winter, 191 N.Y. 462, 473-475; Matter of Rhinelander, 290 N.Y. 31, 37; Benesch v. Benesch, 182 App. Div. 221; Drane v. Drane, 207 App. Div. 217; Almonte v. Almonte, 259 App. Div. 311; Matter of Tierney, 148 Misc. 378, 383.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for separation.)


Summaries of

Oatman v. Oatman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1943
267 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Oatman v. Oatman

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET OATMAN, Respondent, v. PHILIP OATMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1943

Citations

267 App. Div. 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Citing Cases

McAvoy v. McAvoy

( Johnson v. Johnson, 206 N.Y. 561; Stoddard v. Stoddard, 227 N.Y. 13; Goldman v. Goldman, 282 N.Y. 296;…

Haas v. Haas

While the husband may not by contract be relieved of his duty to support the wife, the husband and wife may…