From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oakley v. East Lake Drywall

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 30, 1994
641 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-3326.

August 30, 1994.

An appeal from an order of the judge of compensation claims; William M. Wieland, Judge.

Herbert M. Hill of Orlando, and Bill McCabe, Longwood, for appellant.

Lisa J. Hurley, Pyle, Jones Hurley, P.A., Winter Park, for appellees.


The issue of whether claimant was entitled to benefits as a statutory employee, pursuant to sections 440.02(13)(c) and 440.10(1), Florida Statutes, was not raised before the judge of compensation claims (JCC), and therefore not properly raised for the first time on appeal. Cooley v. McCallister, 468 So.2d 488 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The JCC's determination that the claimant was an independent contractor is supported by competent substantial evidence, and is affirmed.

ERVIN, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Oakley v. East Lake Drywall

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 30, 1994
641 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Oakley v. East Lake Drywall

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT OAKLEY, APPELLANT, v. EAST LAKE DRYWALL AND CLAIMS CENTER, APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 30, 1994

Citations

641 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)