From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. 251-18 GCP Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 2002
293 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-10837

Argued February 26, 2002.

April 1, 2002.

In an action to foreclose a tax lien, the defendant 251-18 GCP Corp., a/k/a GCP Corp., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated September 11, 2000, which denied its motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated June 26, 1998, entered upon its failure to appear or answer the complaint.

Paula Schwartz Frome, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Paul T. Rephen, Elizabeth Dvorkin, and Mark Tyler of counsel), for respondents.

Ginsburg Misk, Queens Village, N.Y. (Hal R. Ginsburg of counsel), for nonparty Yeshiva HorTorah.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant did not establish the existence of a meritorious defense to this foreclosure action, and thus is not entitled to vacatur of the judgment of foreclosure and sale (see Taieb v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 60 N.Y.2d 725).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

RITTER, J.P., SMITH, FRIEDMANN and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. 251-18 GCP Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 2002
293 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. 251-18 GCP Corp.

Case Details

Full title:NYCTL 1996-1 TRUST, ET AL., respondents, v. 251-18 GCP CORP., a/k/a GCP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 646

Citing Cases

Contimortgage Corporation v. DeRham

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The Supreme…