From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McVey

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 27, 2017
151 A.D.3d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

06-27-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy McVEY, Defendant–Appellant.

Calhoun & Lawrence, LLP, White Plains (Clinton W. Calhoun, III of counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Robert Mciver of counsel), for respondent.


Calhoun & Lawrence, LLP, White Plains (Clinton W. Calhoun, III of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Robert Mciver of counsel), for respondent.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., WEBBER, GESMER, KERN, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), entered on or about September 15, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in granting the People's request for an upward departure based on the egregiousness and extent of defendant's involvement with child pornography, which were not adequately accounted for in the risk assessment instrument, and which outweighed the mitigating factors cited by defendant (see People v. Velasquez, 143 A.D.3d 583, 40 N.Y.S.3d 60 [1st Dept.2016], lv. denied 28 N.Y.3d 914, 2017 WL 525560 [2017] ). We reject defendant's argument that defendants in child pornography possession cases are inherently prejudiced by assessment under the Risk Assessment Instrument, and the upward or downward departure protocol (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 855, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ; People v. Johnson, 11 N.Y.3d 416, 420–421, 872 N.Y.S.2d 379, 900 N.E.2d 930 [2008] ). We also reject defendant's assertion that the court improperly failed to take into account the "totality of the circumstances" when weighing the aggravating and mitigating circumstances of defendant's case (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d at 861, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 ).

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.


Summaries of

People v. McVey

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 27, 2017
151 A.D.3d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. McVey

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy McVEY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 27, 2017

Citations

151 A.D.3d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 5185
58 N.Y.S.3d 336

Citing Cases

People v. Malena

The risk assessment instrument did not adequately account for these aggravating factors, which justified the…

People v. Gonzalez

The evaluating psychologist found that defendant's risk of reoffense was "incredibly low" and that defendant…