From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nuwintore v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2014
Case No.: 1:13-cv-00967 - AWI - JLT (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2014)

Summary

adopting findings and recommendations in which "the Magistrate Judge converted the motion to strike to a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)."

Summary of this case from Sykes v. Athannasious

Opinion

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00967 - AWI - JLT

04-02-2014

RICHARD NUWINTORE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING DEFENDANT

MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION'S

MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR

PUNITIVE DAMAGES


(Docs. 28, 43)

Defendant Management & Training Corporation ("MTC") seeks dismissal of Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 28.) The Magistrate Judge observed that the Ninth Circuit has opined a Rule 12(f) motion is not a proper method by which to strike a claim for punitive damages. (Doc. 43 at 3-4, citing Whittlestone, Inc. v. HandiCraft Co., 618 F.3d 970, 974 (9th Cir. 2010)). Because MTC argued the factual allegations were insufficient to support a claim for punitive damages, the Magistrate Judge converted the motion to strike to a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). (Id., citing Consumer Solutions Reo, LLC v. Hillery, 658 F.Supp.2d 1002, 1021 (N.D. Cal. 2009)). Finding Plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to support a determination that MTC acted with oppression, fraud, or malice, the Magistrate Judge recommended the motion be granted. (Doc. 43 at 8.)

The parties were granted fourteen days from the date of service, or until March 14, 2014 to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 43 at 8.) Although the parties were "advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order," (id. at 8-9, citing Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)), no objections were filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the action.

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 28, 2014 (Doc. 43) are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Defendants' motion to strike is GRANTED;
3. Plaintiff's prayer for relief for punitive damages is STRICKEN; and
4. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint within 14 days of the date of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nuwintore v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2014
Case No.: 1:13-cv-00967 - AWI - JLT (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2014)

adopting findings and recommendations in which "the Magistrate Judge converted the motion to strike to a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)."

Summary of this case from Sykes v. Athannasious
Case details for

Nuwintore v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD NUWINTORE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MANAGEMENT …

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 2, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00967 - AWI - JLT (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2014)

Citing Cases

Sykes v. Athannasious

The court now turns to its analysis construing Defendants['] motion as a motion to dismiss."); Pena v. Taylor…

Haget v. Bos. Sci. Corp.

More importantly, although named a motion to strike, Defendant's motion challenging Plaintiff's request to…