From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nunn v. United States

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 22, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv1090-MHT (M.D. Ala. Feb. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv1090-MHT

02-22-2013

TYRONE NUNN, SR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


(WO)


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court:

(1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. Nos. 7 and 8) are overruled.
(2) Petitioner's motion to amend (Doc. No. 7) is denied.
(3) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 6) is adopted.
(4) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 2) is denied because the required permission has
not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nunn v. United States

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 22, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv1090-MHT (M.D. Ala. Feb. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Nunn v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE NUNN, SR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 22, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv1090-MHT (M.D. Ala. Feb. 22, 2013)

Citing Cases

Nunn v. Kastner

In addition, Mr. Nunn has been advised several times that if he desires to contest the legality of his…