From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nunn v. Legislation

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 20, 2015
620 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-6902

10-20-2015

MYRON RODERICK NUNN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. N.C. LEGISLATION; FRANK L. PERRY; GEORGE T. SOLOMON; FINESSE COUCH; TODD PINION; ROBERT JONES; BELINDA DUDLEY; RICHARD NEELY; DEAN LOCKLEAR; TIM CURLY; ROBERT WILLIAMS; JAMES HOLMES; ANGIE BENGE; JEFF WILKERSON; MRS. CAMERON; MR. SANDERS; MR. MCCLAIN; DR. MILTON D. WESTBERG; NURSE NELSON; DR. LANCE; NC DPS UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD; MR. PRICE; MS. CLARK; COL RESPASS; RICKY MATTHEWS, Defendants - Appellees.

Myron Roderick Nunn, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03190-FL) Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Myron Roderick Nunn, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Myron Roderick Nunn appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nunn v. N.C. Legislation, No. 5:14-ct-03190-FL (E.D.N.C. April 15, 2015; June 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Nunn v. Legislation

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 20, 2015
620 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Nunn v. Legislation

Case Details

Full title:MYRON RODERICK NUNN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. N.C. LEGISLATION; FRANK L…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 20, 2015

Citations

620 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2015)