From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nunezmarquez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Aug 22, 2024
No. 02-24-00198-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 22, 2024)

Opinion

02-24-00198-CR

08-22-2024

MISAEL NUNEZMARQUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS


Do Not Publish Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b)

On Appeal from the 485th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1811304

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Misael Nunezmarquez attempts to appeal from his conviction for burglary of a habitation with intent to commit a sex offense. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 30.02(d). Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense in exchange for the State's waiving a second count and recommending a twelve-year sentence. The trial court sentenced Appellant in accordance with the plea recommendation. The trial court signed a certification of Appellant's right to appeal, in which it certified that this is "a plea-bargain case, and [appellant] has NO right of appeal." Appellant and his trial counsel signed the certification. Nonetheless, Appellant filed a notice of appeal.

Although Appellant mentioned a motion to suppress in his notice of appeal, and although the trial court's case detail shows that such a motion was filed, the case detail does not show that the motion was ever heard or ruled on. Moreover, as part of his plea admonishments Appellant waived a record of the plea proceeding, and our clerk's office confirmed with the court reporter that no record was taken at the plea hearing. Without a reporter's record of the plea and sentence hearings, Appellant cannot demonstrate that he did not waive his right to appeal any pretrial suppression motion ruling in open court as part of his plea bargain. See Simmons v. State, No. 01-17-00737-CR, 2018 WL 1003626, at *4 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 22, 2018, pet. ref'd) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

On June 17, 2024, we sent a letter to Appellant and his appointed counsel that informed him of the statement in the certification and that explained that unless he filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by June 27, 2024, the appeal could be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3. On June 28, 2024, the letter that we sent to Appellant was returned to us because he had been transferred to a new unit.

On July 23, 2024, we sent a letter to Appellant at his new address, as well as a letter to his appointed counsel, and informed him of the statement in the certification and that explained that unless he filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by August 2, 2024, the appeal could be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3. Appellant filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Thus, in accordance with the trial court's certification that Appellant has no right to appeal, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Carter v. State, No. 02-15-00243-CR, 2015 WL 6394158, at *1 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth Oct. 22, 2015, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication).


Summaries of

Nunezmarquez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Aug 22, 2024
No. 02-24-00198-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Nunezmarquez v. State

Case Details

Full title:MISAEL NUNEZMARQUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Aug 22, 2024

Citations

No. 02-24-00198-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 22, 2024)