From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nunez v. Zhagui

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 2009
60 A.D.3d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 166.

March 26, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.), entered August 8, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey Moskovits, P.C., New York (Holly E. Peck and Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellant.

Friedman Moses, LLP, Garden City (Lisa M. Comeau of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.


After defendant's showing of prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, the court properly found that plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact through his treating doctor's affirmation, which, when considered in connection with MRIs taken within weeks of the accident, found objective medical findings of range of motion limitations contemporaneous with the accident and upon recent examination ( see Thompson v Abbasi, 15 AD3d 95, 97). The existence of a serious injury is also supported by the affirmed report of the orthopedic surgeon who performed surgery on plaintiff's left knee 2 1/2 years after the accident, and found, among other things, a crack on the lateral facet of the patella ( see Morris v Cisse, 58 AD3d 455).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Nunez v. Zhagui

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 2009
60 A.D.3d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Nunez v. Zhagui

Case Details

Full title:HECTOR NUNEZ, Respondent, v. Luis R. ZHAGUI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 26, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2295
876 N.Y.S.2d 26

Citing Cases

Ramathunga v. Mazzota

Such medical proof should be contemporaneous with the accident, showing what quantitative restrictions, if…

Quito v. Paje

Such medical proof should be contemporaneous with the accident, showing what quantitative restrictions, if…