Opinion
12-06-1926
NUGENT v. SPINNING.
James R. Nugent, of Newark, in pro. per. Herbert Boggs, of Newark, for defendant.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Suit by James R. Nugent against Henry R. Spinning for partition. Decree in accordance with opinion.
James R. Nugent, of Newark, in pro. per.
Herbert Boggs, of Newark, for defendant.
BACKES, Vice Chancellor. The title to the Newark meadow land sought to be partitioned in this suit was in Calvin Cole, who, in 1804, by deed of gift recorded in Essex county, conveyed the same to Sally Vance, wife of Edward Vance, for life, remainder to her children. In 1907 the comptroller of Newark conveyed the property to Florence E. Cahill in fee, who purchased it at a sale for taxes, under the Martin Act (4 Comp. St. 1010, p. 5206, § 308 et seq.), and conveyed it to the defendant Lindsley. The proof shows, and it appears by the deed, that the comptroller's conveyance was delivered upon proof of service of notice to redeem by publication addressed to Sally Vance and Edward Vance, then nearly a century dead. Sally Vance had six children. The complainant Nugent holds an undivided interest in the land by conveyance from some of the descendants of Sally Vance's children. The question of jurisdiction raised is decided in Nugent v. Lindsley (N. J. Ch.) 135 A. 271. The invalidity of the deed is disposed of as in Nugent v. Meeker (N. J. Ch.) 135 A. 273. Lindsley has only a tax lien which may be redeemed. The case will be referred to a master, in the manner directed in Nugent v. Lindsley.