From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N.R.L. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 13, 1996
684 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Case No. 96-1438

Opinion Filed December 13, 1996

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Jose R. Rodriguez, Judge

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Andrea J. Surette, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori E. Nelson, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


N.R.L. appeals the order adjudicating him delinquent and committing him to the Department of Juvenile Justice. The order was entered following N.R.L.'s no contest plea to grand theft. N.R.L. was not represented by counsel when he entered his plea, and the transcript of the arraignment reflects that there was no "thorough inquiry" made into N.R.L.'s desire to waive his right to counsel, contrary to the requirement of Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.165(b)(2). Accordingly, we must reverse. See In the Interest of D.L.A., 667 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that reversal is required where child was not advised of his right to counsel at each stage and no inquiry was made to determine whether waiver of that right was freely and intelligently made).

Upon remand, the requirements of rule 8.165 must be adhered to. N.R.L. must be advised of his right to counsel and, if he chooses to waive counsel, N.R.L. must be queried to determine whether his waiver was freely and intelligently made. Only thereafter may N.R.L.'s plea be taken.

REVERSED and REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

PETERSON, C.J., and SHARP, W., J., concur.


Summaries of

N.R.L. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 13, 1996
684 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

N.R.L. v. State

Case Details

Full title:N.R.L., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 13, 1996

Citations

684 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

P.L.S. v. State

This was not the "thorough inquiry" contemplated by Rule 8.165(b)(2). See A.M. v. State, 723 So.2d 383 (Fla.…

L.D.H. v. State

The trial court asked if appellant was represented by counsel, and his parents responded that they had filed…