From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novozymes A/S v. Phlburg Techs., Inc.

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 7, 2014
104 A.3d 39 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Novozymes A/S v. PHLburg Technologies, Inc., No. 425 EDA 2013, 2014 WL 10920474 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 7, 2014) ("Novozymes"), the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a trial court's damages calculation, which applied to each missed payment under a contract the exchange rate that was contemporaneous with that payment.

Summary of this case from G. Geerlings Export B.V. v. Van Hoekelen Greenhouses, Inc.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

NO. 425 EDA 2013

2014-05-07

Novozymes v. PHLburg Tech.

Appeal From: 2011–12537–CT (Chester)

Disposition: Affirmed.

Summaries of

Novozymes A/S v. Phlburg Techs., Inc.

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 7, 2014
104 A.3d 39 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)

In Novozymes A/S v. PHLburg Technologies, Inc., No. 425 EDA 2013, 2014 WL 10920474 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 7, 2014) ("Novozymes"), the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a trial court's damages calculation, which applied to each missed payment under a contract the exchange rate that was contemporaneous with that payment.

Summary of this case from G. Geerlings Export B.V. v. Van Hoekelen Greenhouses, Inc.
Case details for

Novozymes A/S v. Phlburg Techs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NOVOZYMES A/S Appellee v. PHLBURG TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Appellant

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 7, 2014

Citations

104 A.3d 39 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)

Citing Cases

G. Geerlings Export B.V. v. Van Hoekelen Greenhouses, Inc.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has not issued a binding rule governing the method for determining which…

1 Citing Cases