From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novak v. Boeing Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 29, 2012
CASE NO. SACV 09-1011 CJC(ANx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. SACV 09-1011 CJC(ANx)

02-29-2012

SUSAN NOVAK, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated and the general public, et al. Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive. Defendants.


Honorable Cormac J. Carney


ORDER TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE, PLAINTIFFS SUSAN NOVAK'S AND VICTOR CLEMENT'S

REMAINING CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANT THE BOEING COMPANY

Pursuant to Stipulation between the parties and FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, it is hereby ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiffs Susan Novak and Victor Clement asserted in this action, both as individually named plaintiffs and purported class representatives set forth in the Third Amended Complaint, previously filed on June 13, 2011, against Defendant The Boeing Company, are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, in their entirety, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear their own costs and fees connected with this dismissal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______

The Honorable Cormac J. Carney

United States District Judge
4819-2651-0089.1


Summaries of

Novak v. Boeing Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 29, 2012
CASE NO. SACV 09-1011 CJC(ANx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Novak v. Boeing Co.

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN NOVAK, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. SACV 09-1011 CJC(ANx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

Charalambous v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Further, not all employees submitted reimbursement requests regarding internet costs, though they purportedly…