From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nottingham v. Nottingham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep 24, 2015
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 86275 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

Motion No: 521241

09-24-2015

In the Matter of TARA NOTTINGHAM, Appellant, v. BRADLEY NOTTINGHAM, Respondent. A.L. BETH O'CONNOR, as Attorney for the Child, Appellant.


DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Motion for extension of time to perfect appeal taken by attorney for the child.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied, without costs, and without prejudice to renewal supported by an affidavit setting forth facts showing merit to the appeal as required by section 800.12 of this Court's Rules of Practice.

Peters, P.J., Garry, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Nottingham v. Nottingham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep 24, 2015
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 86275 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Nottingham v. Nottingham

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TARA NOTTINGHAM, Appellant, v. BRADLEY NOTTINGHAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 24, 2015

Citations

2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 86275 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Citing Cases

Matter of Kelsey v. Church

Is mandamus the proper remedy? No appeal lies from an ex parte order, because no effectual judgment or order…

Matter of Costello. Nos. 1, 2

The order is, therefore, in the nature of an ex parte order and an appeal does not lie therefrom. ( Hayes v.…