From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noss Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 30, 1985
753 F.2d 1052 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

Opinion

Appeal No. 84-1255.

January 30, 1985.

Mark D. Crames, Sandler Travis, P.C., Miami, Fla., argued for appellant.

Kenneth N. Wolf, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge Intern. Trade Field Office, New York City.

Appealed from: U.S. Court of International Trade; Carman, Judge.

Before BALDWIN, KASHIWA and SMITH, Circuit Judge.


This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that certain imported centrifugal cleaning machines called Radiclones were properly classified under item 661.95 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. We affirm.

OPINION

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Court of International Trade. Noss Co. v. United States, 588 F. Supp. 1408 (C.I.T. 1984).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Noss Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 30, 1985
753 F.2d 1052 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
Case details for

Noss Co. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:NOSS CO., APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 30, 1985

Citations

753 F.2d 1052 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Franklin v. U.S.

This court has previously construed the tariff terms "filter" and "purify." In Noss Co. v. United States, 7…

Franklin v. U.S.

A SUBHEADING 8421.21.00 Franklin argues that the Court of International Trade erred when it concluded that…