From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norwest Bank Minnesota v. Galasso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 21, 2000
275 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted June 5, 2000.

August 21, 2000.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Philip Galasso, s/h/a as John Doe, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), entered August 12, 1999, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Edmund F. Wolk, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Parker Duryee Rosoff Haft, New York, N.Y. (William M. Rifkin and Lauren A. Blackman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, as an exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the purpose of holding a hearing on the issue of whether personal jurisdiction was obtained over the appellant and thereafter for a new determination of his motion.

The appellant's sworn statement that no summons and complaint appeared on his door on May 14, 1999, sufficiently refuted the process server's affidavit stating that the service was properly accomplished pursuant to CPLR 308(4). Accordingly, a hearing should have been held (see, Hopkins v. Tinghino, 248 A.D.2d 794).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Norwest Bank Minnesota v. Galasso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 21, 2000
275 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Norwest Bank Minnesota v. Galasso

Case Details

Full title:NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ELIZABETH W. L…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 21, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
712 N.Y.S.2d 878

Citing Cases

Pasanella v. Quinn

Although a party seeking renewal should offer a reasonable justification for failing to present any new facts…

Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Peralta

This sworn statement is sufficient to refute the process server's assertion that the summons and complaint…