From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Northwest Marine Term. v. Federal Maritime Bd.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 17, 1955
218 F.2d 815 (9th Cir. 1955)

Opinion

No. 14414.

January 17, 1955.

Bogle, Bogle, Gates, Edward G. Dobrin, Robert W. Graham, Seattle, Wash., Thomas J. White, Norman E. Sutherland, White, Sutherland Parks, Portland, Or., for appellants.

Stanley N. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daniel M. Friedman, Spe. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Clarence G. Morse, Gen. Counsel, Max E. Halpern, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Edward Aptaker, Atty., Federal Maritime Board, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Wood, Matthiessen, Wood Tatum, Erskine B. Wood, Portland, Or., for intervenor.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.


Petitioner filed a petition to review a final order of the Federal Maritime Board which was entered more than 60 days before review was sought. It contends that inasmuch as it filed a motion with the Board for reconsideration, its 60 days runs from the entry of the order denying reconsideration. We disposed of this contention adversely to petitioner in Consolidated Flower Shipments, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 449.

The 60 days commences when the Board's final order is handed down and a subsequent petition for rehearing or reconsideration does not extend that time.

The motion to dismiss the petition is granted.


Summaries of

Northwest Marine Term. v. Federal Maritime Bd.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 17, 1955
218 F.2d 815 (9th Cir. 1955)
Case details for

Northwest Marine Term. v. Federal Maritime Bd.

Case Details

Full title:NORTHWEST MARINE TERMINALS ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 17, 1955

Citations

218 F.2d 815 (9th Cir. 1955)

Citing Cases

Samuel B. Franklin Co. v. Sec. Exch. Com'n

In so reasoning the court relied upon three decisions of the Supreme Court: Packard Motor Car Co. v.…