From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North Sea Developments, Inc. v. Burnett

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1930
173 N.E. 228 (N.Y. 1930)

Opinion

Argued October 16, 1930

Decided October 24, 1930

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Reginald Condon Smith and Robert P. Griffing for appellant.

Joseph H. Inness for respondent.


The record presents a question of fact whether before the broker had earned any commissions he agreed that his compensation should be five per cent on payments as made on the contract and five per cent on the amount of the mortgage when title passes. Title to the property has never passed and the broker has received five per cent commissions on all payments made.

The bid made at the judicial sale was not a payment made under the contract.

The judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term should be reversed and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment denied, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division and ten dollars costs of motion.

CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ., concur; CRANE, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

North Sea Developments, Inc. v. Burnett

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1930
173 N.E. 228 (N.Y. 1930)
Case details for

North Sea Developments, Inc. v. Burnett

Case Details

Full title:NORTH SEA DEVELOPMENTS, INC., Respondent, v. EGBERT L. BURNETT, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1930

Citations

173 N.E. 228 (N.Y. 1930)
173 N.E. 228

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. C.H.S. Holding Corporation

The plaintiff failed to prove any right to recover under the brokerage contract. (See North Sea Developments,…

Dallas Dome Wyoming Oil Fields Co. v. Brooder

By doing so, we find that the purchaser was unable to comply with the terms of purchase, and that the parties…